<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q-See QSD360 Outdoor Vandalproof Dome CCD Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pocketsizedvideo.com/1020/q-see-qsd360-outdoor-vandalproof-dome-ccd-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pocketsizedvideo.com/1020/q-see-qsd360-outdoor-vandalproof-dome-ccd-camera/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 06:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Viveca</title>
		<link>http://www.pocketsizedvideo.com/1020/q-see-qsd360-outdoor-vandalproof-dome-ccd-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Viveca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pocketsizedvideo.com/1020/q-see-qsd360-outdoor-vandalproof-dome-ccd-camera/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>&lt;/div&gt;

I purchased one of these QSD360 cameras to install as part of an outdoor surveillance system however Amazon&#039;s product description is misleading - this camera came labeled with a large sticker that states &quot;Indoor&quot; yet Amazon markets this item as an &quot;outdoor&quot; camera. Further, the item&#039;s packaging states that this camera has a 3mm-9mm lens (not 3.5-8 as Amazon lists) and the minimum illumination level is stated to be 0.5Lux (not 0.1 Lux).&#13;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s also supposed to output 480 TVL resolution however after side-by-side testing, I&#039;ve found that this camera&#039;s image quality is not as high as other Q-see cameras that are rated only at 420TVL (namely the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000LW7Z4Q/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk&quot;&gt;Q-See QS2350C Weatherproof Color CCD Camera Kit With Built-in Heat Circulating Blower&lt;/a&gt;). The image quality isn&#039;t that bad (you can still identify faces) but there is noticeable noise in the picture that isn&#039;t in the lower-cost 420TVL outdoor units. It seems that much of the high cost of this camera is not because of the supposed 480TVL lens but rather because it is apparently &quot;vandalproof&quot; (something I guess time will tell).&#13;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A third comment: This camera can handle low light situations fairly well even though there are no IR LEDs. In close-to-complete darkness though, the camera could not distinguish any objects so if you&#039;re planning on using this unit as a night-time surveillance tool, you will most likely need ambient lighting or an array of IR LEDs close to the camera to make this camera useful.
      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased one of these QSD360 cameras to install as part of an outdoor surveillance system however Amazon&#8217;s product description is misleading &#8211; this camera came labeled with a large sticker that states &#8220;Indoor&#8221; yet Amazon markets this item as an &#8220;outdoor&#8221; camera. Further, the item&#8217;s packaging states that this camera has a 3mm-9mm lens (not 3.5-8 as Amazon lists) and the minimum illumination level is stated to be 0.5Lux (not 0.1 Lux).&#13;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also supposed to output 480 TVL resolution however after side-by-side testing, I&#8217;ve found that this camera&#8217;s image quality is not as high as other Q-see cameras that are rated only at 420TVL (namely the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000LW7Z4Q/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk">Q-See QS2350C Weatherproof Color CCD Camera Kit With Built-in Heat Circulating Blower</a>). The image quality isn&#8217;t that bad (you can still identify faces) but there is noticeable noise in the picture that isn&#8217;t in the lower-cost 420TVL outdoor units. It seems that much of the high cost of this camera is not because of the supposed 480TVL lens but rather because it is apparently &#8220;vandalproof&#8221; (something I guess time will tell).&#13;</p>
<p>A third comment: This camera can handle low light situations fairly well even though there are no IR LEDs. In close-to-complete darkness though, the camera could not distinguish any objects so if you&#8217;re planning on using this unit as a night-time surveillance tool, you will most likely need ambient lighting or an array of IR LEDs close to the camera to make this camera useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
